A candid photo with Marcus on Day 1
Some of the highlights of this week included:
1. Focused Conversation 1
Our FC1 took place in a group setting, with 4 out of 5 of the practicum trainees (one of them was unable to make it for that timing as she had to chaperone some students to NUS, and she had her FC1 at an earlier timeslot) as well as our SCM and another senior teacher present. It was a good opportunity to share and learn from each other's NIE experiences, and I enjoyed seeing my peers' showcase of their lesson artifacts and other materials. The Q&A was a good opportunity for reflection, and I felt that our SCM and senior teacher were not only constructive in their feedback, but also provided a lot of sound advice on the teaching profession.
2. Lesson observations
During this first week, my History colleague (Marcus) and I got to observe several lectures and tutorials, some of which were conducted by Geography and Economics teachers. Observing lessons that were not from our subject domain was a good learning experience - since we were not familiar with the content, it was really an opportunity for us to pick up on other aspects of teaching such as classroom management. Since AJC does not adopt any standardized school-wide approach to discipline, each teacher is free to craft his or her own classroom management style, and observing these lessons gave us new perspectives on how to tackle common classroom issues such as unresponsive or sleepy students, as well as how to enforce expectations, pace lessons, and pose questions that stimulate higher-order thinking. We also got to learn more about the profile of AJC students.
3. My first tutorial
My first tutorial (an unobserved one) was on Thursday, and my CT was very kind in providing Marcus and I with many suggestions on how to set our expectations for our classes. Unfortunately, during my tutorial, the unexpected happened - I was unable to connect my laptop to the projector, and wasted about ten minutes moving from room to room to try and see if the laptop would connect while leaving my students unattended in the original venue. This was a major blunder, and I realise on hindsight that I should have gone to the tutorial venue beforehand to ensure that everything was working fine before conducting my lesson. While I attempted to mitigate this problem by giving them a small introduction task to do while waiting, I still felt like I was wasting everyone's time and creating a terrible first impression. Thankfully, my students remained patient and responsive despite this bad start to our lesson, and I was able to improvise by explaining things verbally and using the whiteboard instead of the Powerpoint slides which I had prepared beforehand. This whole experience was really a major learning point for me, and I've since made it a point to check my classrooms beforehand if my lesson happens to require technological support. I've also realised the importance of taking responsibility for my mistakes and being accountable to my students - before starting the tutorial proper, I gave them a sincere apology, and I felt that doing so helped me to build some rapport and (hopefully) transmit the value of responsibility and honesty. These are qualities which I would like to see my students develop, and I hope that by first modelling it for them, they could learn from my example.
4. My first co-tutorial
As Marcus and I are both History teachers on practicum, our CT advised us to try co-teaching. In other words, we should sit in for each other's lessons where possible, and while one of us executes the lesson proper, the other helps by maintaining classroom discipline and checking on the students during group work segments. On Friday, we had our first co-teaching session, and we decided that the aim of this tutorial should be to familiarise students with the demands of an essay, since essays are the primary assessment mode in History at the A Levels. We sought our CT's advice on how to introduce essay-writing skills to our students in a fun and accessible manner, and he suggested using a question on pop culture to arouse their interest and ensure that the focus would be on their skills instead of their ability to grapple with content knowledge. We put his suggestion into practice, setting a question that required them to assess the merits of Lady Gaga in comparison with Bruno Mars and Katy Perry, and the students responded positively to this. The introductory paragraphs which they wrote in groups of 4 were fairly indicative of their ability - we could see clearly, for example, where they struggled with organisation of ideas and overly narrative writing - and we also took note of the group dynamics as that would give us a sense of how to organise the class for future collaborative learning experiences. When we asked the students to present their work, however, they were a little reticient, and we had to do a lot of probing and scaffolding to find out why they wrote in the way they did. After some discussion with each other and our CT, Marcus and I thought it best to attribute this unresponsiveness to a lack of confidence in our students, unfamiliarity with our expectations, and perhaps insufficient rapport as well, and we decided to just give them more time to find their footing and be more encouraging in our efforts to get them to speak up.
4. My first co-tutorial
As Marcus and I are both History teachers on practicum, our CT advised us to try co-teaching. In other words, we should sit in for each other's lessons where possible, and while one of us executes the lesson proper, the other helps by maintaining classroom discipline and checking on the students during group work segments. On Friday, we had our first co-teaching session, and we decided that the aim of this tutorial should be to familiarise students with the demands of an essay, since essays are the primary assessment mode in History at the A Levels. We sought our CT's advice on how to introduce essay-writing skills to our students in a fun and accessible manner, and he suggested using a question on pop culture to arouse their interest and ensure that the focus would be on their skills instead of their ability to grapple with content knowledge. We put his suggestion into practice, setting a question that required them to assess the merits of Lady Gaga in comparison with Bruno Mars and Katy Perry, and the students responded positively to this. The introductory paragraphs which they wrote in groups of 4 were fairly indicative of their ability - we could see clearly, for example, where they struggled with organisation of ideas and overly narrative writing - and we also took note of the group dynamics as that would give us a sense of how to organise the class for future collaborative learning experiences. When we asked the students to present their work, however, they were a little reticient, and we had to do a lot of probing and scaffolding to find out why they wrote in the way they did. After some discussion with each other and our CT, Marcus and I thought it best to attribute this unresponsiveness to a lack of confidence in our students, unfamiliarity with our expectations, and perhaps insufficient rapport as well, and we decided to just give them more time to find their footing and be more encouraging in our efforts to get them to speak up.
No comments:
Post a Comment